Cursor is the better app overall, scoring 8.7 to 7.8. Cursor wins on 5 of the 5 scores, Postman on 0.
Developers who want AI help built into every part of their editor
API developers and QA teams who test and document APIs together
Score by score
The details
| Feature | Cursor | Postman |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| Category rank | #5 of 8 | #8 of 8 |
| Developer | Anysphere | Postman, Inc. |
| Pricing | Free + paid plans | Free + paid plans |
| Usable for free | Yes | Yes |
| Mac | ✓ | ✓ |
| Windows | ✓ | ✓ |
| Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web | — | ✓ |
Strengths and weaknesses
Cursor
- Deep AI help built into every part of the editor
- Familiar VS Code base with easy migration
- Choice of frontier models from several labs
- Usage-based pricing can be hard to predict
- Code is processed by cloud AI models
Cursor is the AI code editor many developers switch to first. It is built on VS Code, so your extensions and settings carry over, and it adds fast tab completion, an agent that edits across many files, and cloud agents that work in the background. The catch is pricing: usage-based limits can be hard to predict, and your code is processed in the cloud, so use Privacy Mode for sensitive work.
Full Cursor review
Postman
- Covers the whole API lifecycle in one tool
- Easy to share collections with teammates
- Strong support for many API protocols
- Desktop app is heavy and can feel slow
- Most work is stored in Postman's cloud
Postman is the most complete tool for working with APIs. You can send requests, organize them into collections, write tests, generate docs, run mock servers and monitor endpoints, with support for REST, GraphQL, gRPC and WebSockets. Teams get shared workspaces and version control. The downsides are a heavy desktop app, constant nudges toward paid plans, and a push to store your work in Postman's cloud.
Full Postman review
