LumaFusion vs VSCO
Which is better in 2026? Five scores, side by side.
LumaFusion is the better app overall, scoring 8.6 to 7.8. LumaFusion wins on 4 of the 5 scores, VSCO on 1.
Video creators who want a desktop-class timeline on an iPad or Android tablet
Photographers who want a consistent film look and a place to share it
Score by score
The details
| Feature | LumaFusion | VSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo & Video | Photo & Video |
| Category rank | #5 of 8 | #8 of 8 |
| Developer | LumaTouch | VSCO |
| Pricing | Paid | Free + paid plans |
| Usable for free | No | Yes |
| iPhone & iPad | ✓ | ✓ |
| Android | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mac | ✓ | — |
| Web | — | ✓ |
Strengths and weaknesses
LumaFusion
- Desktop-style timeline that works well with touch
- One-time purchase covers the core editor
- Edits locally with no account required
- Steeper learning curve than template apps
- Multicam and stock media cost extra
LumaFusion is one of the most capable video editors you can run on a tablet. You get multiple video and audio tracks, keyframes, color correction, titles and external display support, all from a one-time purchase. Optional add-ons bring extras like multicam editing and stock media. It takes time to learn, but it's the pick for serious mobile editors who want a real timeline.
Full LumaFusion review
VSCO
- Presets give a consistent, film-like look
- Clean, simple editing interface
- Low-pressure community for sharing work
- Most presets and tools need a membership
- Editing depth trails dedicated editors
VSCO is known for its film-inspired presets, and they still look great. The editor covers the essentials, and the app doubles as a low-key community for sharing photos. The catch is value: most of the best presets and tools sit behind a paid membership, and the editing depth trails Lightroom and Darkroom. Get it if you love a consistent film look across your feed.
Full VSCO review
